Hong Kong


CONTROL OF EXEMPTION CLAUSES ORDINANCE
　(CHAPTER 71)
　CONTENTS
　　
　　ion
　　I　　　　PRELIMINARY
　　hort title
　　nterpretation and application
　　he "reasonableness" test
　　Dealing as consumer"
　　arieties of exemption clause
　　ower to amend Schedules 1 and 2
　　II　　　　CONTROL OF EXEMPTION CLAUSES
　　dance of liability for negligence, breach of contract, etc.
　　egligence liability
　　iability arising in contract
　　nreasonable indemnity clauses Liability arising from sale or
supply of
　　s
　　"Guarantee" of consumer goods
　　Seller's liability
　　Miscellaneous contracts under which goods pass Other provisions
about
　　racts
　　Effect of breach on "reasonableness" test
　　Evasion by means of secondary contract
　　Arbitration agreements
　　III　　　CIRCUMSTANCES WHERE CONTROL DOES NOT APPLY
　　International supply contracts
　　Choice of law clauses
　　Saving for other relevant legislation
　　Application
　　IV　　　 CONSEQUENTIAL AND OTHER AMENDMENTS
　　(Omitted)
　　dule 1. Scope of sections 7, 8, 9 and 12
　　dule 2. "Guidelines" for application of reasonableness test
　　dule 3. (Omitted)
　Whole document
　　
　　imit the extent to which civil liability for breach　of　contract,　
or
　　negligence or other breach　of　duty,　can　be　avoided　by　
means　of
　　ract terms and　otherwise;　and　to　restrict　the　
enforceability　of
　　tration agreements.　[1 December 1990] L. N. 38 of 1990
　PART I PRELIMINARY
　　
　　hort title
　　Ordinance may be cited as the Control of Exemption Clauses
Ordinance.
　　nterpretation and application
　　In this Ordinance--
　　iness" includes a profession and the activities of a　public　
body,　a
　　ic　authority,　or　a　board,　commission,　committee　or　
other　body
　　inted by the Governor or Government;
　　ds" has the same meaning as in the Sale of Goods Ordinance (Cap.
26);
　　ligence" means the breach--
　　of any obligation, arising from the express　or　implied　terms　
of　a
　　ract, to take reasonable care or　exercise　reasonable　skill　
in　the
　　ormance of the contract;
　　of any common law duty to take reasonable care or exercise　
reasonable
　　l (but not any stricter duty);
　　of the　common　duty　of　care　imposed　by　the　Occupiers　
Liability
　　nance (Cap. 314); "notice" includes an announcement, whether or
not in
　　hing, and any other communication or pretended communication;
　　sonal injury" includes any disease and any impairment of　
physical　or
　　al condition.
　　In the case of both contract and tort, sections 7 to 12 apply　
(except
　　e the　contrary　is　stated　in　section　11　(4))　only　to　
business
　　ility, that is liability for breach of obligations or duties
arising--
　　from things done or omitted to be done by a person in the course
of　a
　　ness (whether his own business or another's); or
　　from the occupation of premises used　for　business　purposes　
of　the
　　pier, and references to liability are　to　be　read　
accordingly;　but
　　ility of an occupier of premises for breach of an obligation　or　
duty
　　rds a person obtaining access to　the　premises　for　
recreational　or
　　ational purposes, being liability　for　loss　or　damage　
suffered　by
　　on of the dangerous state of the premises, is not a business
liability
　　he occupier unless granting that person such access for　the　
purposes
　　erned falls within the business purposes of the occupier.
　　In relation to any breach of duty　or　obligation,　it　is　
immaterial
　　her the breach was inadvertent or intentional,　or　whether　
liability
　　it arises directly or vicariously.
　　1977 c. 50 ss. 1&14 U. K.]
　　he "reasonableness" test
　　In relation to a contract term, the requirement of reasonableness　
for
　　purposes of this Ordinance and　section　4　of　the　
Misrepresentation
　　nance (Cap.　284)　is　satisfied　only　if　the　court　or　
arbitrator
　　rmines that the term was a fair and　reasonable　one　to　be　
included
　　ng regard to the circumstances which were, or ought reasonably
to have
　　, known to or in the contemplation of the parties　when　the　
contract
　　made.
　　In determining for the purposes of section 11 or 12 whether a
contract
　　satisfies the requirement of reasonableness, the court or　
arbitrator
　　l have regard in particular to the matters specified　in　
Schedule　2;
　　this subsection does not prevent the court or arbitrator from
holding,
　　ccordance with any rule of law, that a term which purports to　
exclude
　　estrict any relevant liability is not a term of the contract.
　　
　　In relation to　a　notice　(not　being　a　notice　having　
contractual
　　ct),　the　requirement　of　reasonableness　under　this　
Ordinance　is
　　sfied only if the court or arbitrator determines that it would
be fair
　　reasonable　to　allow　reliance　on　it,　having　regard　to　
all　the
　　umstances obtaining when the liability arose or (but for　the　
notice)
　　d have arisen.
　　In　determining　(under　this　Ordinance　or　the　
Misrepresentation
　　nance (Cap. 284)) whether a contract　term　or　notice　
satisfies　the
　　irement of reasonableness, the court or arbitrator shall　have　
regard
　　articular (but without prejudice to subsection (2) to whether
(and, if
　　to what extent) the language in which the term or notice is　
expressed
　　language understood by the person　as　against　whom　another　
person
　　s to rely upon the term or notice.
　　Where by reference to a contract term or　notice　a　person　
seeks　to
　　rict liability to a specified sum of money, and the question
arises
　　er this Ordinance　or　the　Misrepresentation　Ordinance　(Cap.　
284))
　　her the term or notice satisfies the　requirement　of　
reasonableness,
　　court or arbitrator shall　have　regard　in　particular　(but　
without
　　udice to subsection (2) or (4)) to--
　　the resources which he could expect to be available　to　him　for　
the
　　ose of meeting the liability should it arise; and
　　how far it was open to him to cover himself by insurance.
　　It is for the person claiming that a contract term or notice
satisfies
　　requirement of reasonableness to prove that it does.
　　1977 c. 50 s. 11 U. K.]
　　Dealing as consumer"
　　A party to a contract "deals as consumer" in relation to another
party
　　
　　he neither makes the contract in the course of a　business　nor　
holds
　　elf out as doing so;
　　the other party does make the contract in the course　of　a　
business;
　　
　　in the case of a contract governed by the law of sale of goods　
or　by
　　ion 12, the goods passing under or in pursuance of the contract
are of
　　pe ordinarily supplied for private use or consumption.
　　Notwithstanding subsection (1), on a sale by auction or by
competitive
　　er the buyer is not in any circumstances to be regarded as dealing　
as
　　umer.
　　It is for the person claiming that a party does not deal　as　
consumer
　　rove that he does not.
　　1977 c. 50 s. 12 U. K.]
　　
　　arieties of exemption clause
　　To　the　extent　that　this　Ordinance　prevents　the　
exclusion　 or
　　riction of any liability it also prevents--
　　making the liability or its　enforcement　subject　to　
restrictive　or
　　ous conditions;
　　excluding or restricting　any　right　or　remedy　in　respect　
of　the
　　ility, or subjecting a person to any prejudice in consequence　of　
his
　　uing any such right or remedy;
　　excluding or restricting rules of evidence or procedure, and (to　
that
　　nt) sections 7, 10, 11 and 12 also prevent　excluding　or　
restricting
　　ility by reference to terms and notices which　 exclude　 or　
restrict
　　relevant obligation or duty.
　　An agreement in writing to submit present　or　future　
differences　to
　　tration is not to be treated under　this　Ordinance　as　
excluding　or
　　ricting any liability.　[cf. 1977 c. 50 s. 13 U. K.]
　　ower to amend Schedules 1 and 2
　　Legislative Council may by resolution amend Schedules 1 and 2.
　PART II CONTROL OF EXEMPTION CLAUSES
　　
　　dance of liability for negligence, breach of contract, etc.
　　egligence liability
　　A person cannot by reference to any contract term or to a notice
given
　　ersons generally or to particular　persons　exclude　or　
restrict　his
　　ility for death or personal injury resulting from negligence.
　　In the case of other loss or damage, a person　cannot　so　
exclude　or
　　rict his liability for negligence except in so　far　as　the　
term　or
　　ce satisfies the requirement of reasonableness.
　　Where a contract term　or　notice　purports　to　exclude　or　
restrict
　　ility for negligence a person's agreement to or awareness of it
is not
　　tself to be taken as indicating his voluntary acceptance of any
risk.
　　1977 c. 50 s. 2 U. K.]
　　iability arising in contract
　　This section applies as between contracting parties where one of　
them
　　s as consumer or on the other's written standard terms of
business.
　　As against that party, the other cannot by reference to　any　
contract
　　--
　　When himself in breach of contract, exclude or restrict any　
liability
　　is in respect of the breach; or
　　claim to be entitled--
　　to render a contractual performance substantially different from　
that
　　h was reasonably expected of him; or
　　in respect of the whole or any part of his contractual obligation,
to
　　er no performance at all,
　　pt in so far　as　(in　any　of　the　cases　mentioned　above　
in　this
　　ection) the contract term satisfies the requirement of
reasonableness.
　　1977 c. 50 s. 3 U. K.]
　　nreasonable indemnity clauses
　　A person dealing as consumer cannot by reference to any contract　
term
　　ade to indemnify another person (whether a party to　the　
contract　or
　　in respect of liability　that　may　be　incurred　by　the　
other　for
　　igence or breach of contract, except in so far as　the　contract　
term
　　sfies the requirement of reasonableness.
　　This section applies whether the liability in question--
　　is directly that of the person to be indemnified or is incurred
by him
　　riously;
　　is to the person dealing as consumer or to someone else. [cf. 1977　
c.
　　. 4 U. K.]
　　ility arising from sale or supply of goods
　　
　　"Guarantee" of consumer goods
　　In the case of goods of a type ordinarily supplied for private
use　or
　　umption, where loss or damage--
　　arises from the goods proving defective while in consumer use;
and
　　results from the negligence of a person concerned in　the　
manufacture
　　istribution of the goods, liability for the loss or damage　
cannot　be
　　uded or restricted　by　reference　to　any　contract　term　or　
notice
　　ained in or operating by reference to a guarantee of the goods.
　　For these purposes--
　　goods are to be regarded as "in consumer use" when a person　is　
using
　　, or has them in his possession for use,　otherwise　than　
exclusively
　　the purposes of a business; and
　　anything in writing is a guarantee　if　it　contains　or　
purports　to
　　ain some promise or　assurance　(however　worded　or　
presented)　that
　　cts will be made good　by　complete　or　partial　replacement,　
or　by
　　ir, monetary compensation or otherwise.
　　This section does not apply as between the parties to a contract
under
　　n pursuance of which possession or ownership of the goods passed.
　　1977 c. 50 s. 5 U. K.]
　　Seller's liability
　　Liability for breach of the obligations arising from section 14
of the
　　of Goods Ordinance (Cap. 26) (seller's　implied　undertakings　
as　to
　　e, etc.) cannot be excluded or restricted by reference to any
contract
　　.
　　As against a person dealing as consumer, liability for breach　of　
the
　　gations arising from section 15,　16　or　17　of　the　Sale　of　
Goods
　　nance (Cap. 26) (seller's implied undertakings　as　to　
conformity　of
　　s with description or sample, or as to their quality or fitness
for　a
　　icular purpose) cannot be excluded or restricted by reference　to　
any
　　ract term.
　　As against a person dealing otherwise than as consumer, the　
liability
　　ified in subsection (2) can be excluded or restricted by reference　
to
　　ntract term, but only in so far as the term satisfies the　
requirement
　　easonableness.
　　The liabilities referred to in this section are not only the　
business
　　ilities defined by section 2 (2), but include those arising under　
any
　　ract of sale of goods.　[cf. 1977 c. 50 s. 6 U. K.]
　　Miscellaneous contracts under which goods pass
　　Where the　possession　or　ownership　of　goods　passes　
under　or　in
　　uance of a contract　not　governed　by　the　law　of　sale　of　
goods,
　　ection (2) to (4) apply in relation to the effect (if　any)　that　
the
　　t or arbitrator is to give to contract terms excluding or　
restricting
　　ility for breach of obligation arising by implication of law from　
the
　　re of the contract.
　　As against a person dealing as consumer, liability in respect　of　
the
　　's correspondence with description or　sample,　or　their　
quality　or
　　ess for any particular purpose, cannot be excluded　or　
restricted　by
　　rence to any such term.
　　As against a person dealing otherwise than as consumer, that
liability
　　be excluded or restricted by reference to such a term, but only
in　so
　　as the term satisfies the requirement of reasonableness.
　　
　　Liability in respect of--
　　the right to transfer ownership of the goods, or give possession;
or
　　the assurance　of　quiet　possession　to　a　person　taking　
goods　in
　　uance of the contract, cannot be excluded or restricted　by　
reference
　　ny such term except in so far as the term satisfies the requirement
of
　　onableness.　[cf. 1977 c. 50 s. 7 U. K.]
　　r provisions about contracts
　　Effect of breach on "reasonableness" test
　　Where for reliance　upon　it　a　contract　term　has　to　
satisfy　the
　　irement of reasonableness, it may be found　to　do　so　and　be　
given
　　ct accordingly notwithstanding that the contract has　been　
terminated
　　er by breach or by a party electing to treat it as repudiated.
　　Where on a breach the contract is nevertheless　affirmed　by　a　
party
　　tled to treat as repudiated, this　does　not　of　itself　
exclude　the
　　irement of reasonableness in relation to any contract term.
　　1977 c. 50 s. 9 U. K.]
　　Evasion by means of secondary contract
　　rson is not bound by any contract　term　prejudicing　or　taking　
away
　　ts of his which arise under, or in connection with the performance
of,
　　her contract, so far as those rights　extend　to　the　
enforcement　of
　　her's　liability　which　this　Ordinance　prevents　that　
other　 from
　　uding or restricting.
　　1977 c. 50 s. 10 U. K.]
　　Arbitration agreements
　　As against a person dealing as consumer, an agreement to submit
future
　　erences to arbitration cannot be enforced except--
　　with his written consent signified after the differences　in　
question
　　arisen; or
　　where he has himself had recourse to arbitration in pursuance　of　
the
　　ement in respect of any differences.
　　Subsection (1) does not affect--
　　the enforcement of an international arbitration agreement　
within　the
　　ing of section 2 (1) of the Arbitration Ordinance (Cap. 341);
　　laced 76 of 1990 s. 2)
　　the resolution of differences arising under any contract so far
as　it
　　by virtue of Schedule 1, excluded from the operation of section
7,　8,
　　12.
　PART III CIRCUMSTANCES WHERE CONTROL DOES NOT APPLY
　　
　　International supply contracts
　　The limits imposed by this Ordinance on the extent to which　a　
person
　　exclude or restrict liability by reference to a contract term　do　
not
　　y to liability arising under an international supply contract.
　　The terms of an international supply contract are not subject　to　
any
　　irement of reasonableness under section 8 or 9.
　　For the purposes of this section,　an　international　supply　
contract
　　s a contract--
　　that is either a contract of sale of goods or a contract under　
or　in
　　uance of which the possession or ownership of goods passes;
　　that is made by parties whose places of business　(or,　if　they　
have
　　, habitual residences) are in the territories of different　
States　or
　　in and outside Hong Kong; and
　　in the case of which--
　　the goods in question are, at　the　time　of　the　conclusion　
of　the
　　ract, in the　course　of　carriage,　or　will　be　carried,　
from　the
　　itory of one State to the territory of another, or　to　or　from　
Hong
　　from or to a place outside Hong Kong; or
　　the acts constituting the offer and acceptance have been done in　
the
　　itories of different States or in and outside Hong Kong; or
　　) the contract provides for the goods to be delivered to the
territory
　　State other than that within whose territory　the　acts　
constituting
　　offer and acceptance were done; or
　　the acts constituting the offer and acceptance were done in Hong
Kong
　　the contract provides for the goods to be delivered outside Hong
Kong;
　　
　　the acts constituting the offer and acceptance were done outside　
Hong
　　and the contract provides for the goods to be delivered to Hong
Kong.
　　1977 c. 50 s. 26 U. K.]
　　Choice of law clauses
　　Where the proper law of a contract is the law of　Hong　Kong　only　
by
　　ce of the parties (and apart from that choice would be the law
of some
　　r country) sections 7 to 12 do not operate as part of the proper
law.
　　This Ordinance has effect　notwithstanding　any　contract　
term　which
　　ies or purports to apply the law of some other country, where　
(either
　　oth)--
　　the term appears to the court　or　arbitrator　to　have　been　
imposed
　　ly or mainly for the purpose of enabling　the　party　imposing　
it　to
　　e the operation of this Ordinance; or
　　in the making of the contract one of the parties　dealt　as　
consumer,
　　he was then habitually resident in Hong Kong, and the essential　

不分页显示　　　总共2页　　1 [2]

　　下一页

浙江省温州市人大常委会


温州市人民代表大会常务委员会任免国家机关工作人员办法

（2000年1月26日温州市第九届人民代表大会常务委员会第十三次会议通过 2003年6月30日温州市第十届人民代表大会常务委员会第二次会议第一次修订 2009年12月30日温州市第十一届人民代表大会常务委员会第二十一次会议第二次修订）


第一章　总　　则


第一条　为保证温州市人民代表大会常务委员会（以下简称市人大常委会）依法行使人事任免权，根据《中华人民共和国各级人民代表大会常务委员会监督法》、《中华人民共和国地方各级人民代表大会和地方各级人民政府组织法》、《中华人民共和国各级人民法院组织法》、《中华人民共和国各级人民检察院组织法》等法律的有关规定，结合本市实际，制定本办法。

第二条　市人大常委会行使人事任免权，应当全面贯彻革命化、年轻化、知识化、专业化方针，坚持德才兼备原则，充分发扬民主，严格依法办事。

第三条　市人大常委会依照法律行使下列人事任免权：

（一）决定任免。在市人民代表大会闭会期间，决定市人民政府个别副市长的任免；决定属于市人民政府组成人员的秘书长、局长、委员会主任的任免，报省人民政府备案。

（二）任免。任免市人大常委会代表资格审查委员会的主任委员、副主任委员、委员，代表资格审查委员会组成人员的人选，必须在市人大常委会组成人员中提名；任免市人大常委会副秘书长、办公室主任、副主任、研究室主任、副主任、工作委员会主任、副主任、委员；在市人民代表大会闭会期间，任免市人民代表大会专门委员会个别副主任委员和部分委员，市人民代表大会各专门委员会组成人员的人选，必须在市人民代表大会代表中提名；任免市中级人民法院副院长、审判委员会委员、庭长、副庭长、审判员；任免市人民检察院副检察长、检察委员会委员、检察员。

（三）批准任免和批准辞职。批准任免县（市、区）人民检察院检察长，批准县（市、区）人民检察院检察长的辞职。

（四）推选和决定代理人选。在市人民代表大会闭会期间，市人大常委会主任因故不能工作或者缺位时，由市人大常委会在其副主任中推选一人代理主任职务；市人民政府、市中级人民法院、市人民检察院的正职领导人员因故不能担任职务时，从其副职领导人员中决定代理人选。

决定代理检察长，须报省人民检察院和省人大常委会备案。

（五）撤销职务。在市人民代表大会闭会期间，决定撤销市人民政府个别副市长的职务；决定撤销属于市人民政府组成人员的秘书长、局长、委员会主任的职务；决定撤销市中级人民法院副院长、审判委员会委员、庭长、副庭长、审判员的职务；决定撤销市人民检察院副检察长、检察委员会委员、检察员的职务。

（六）接受辞职。在市人民代表大会闭会期间，接受市人大常委会组成人员和市人民代表大会各专门委员会组成人员的辞职；接受市人民政府市长、副市长、市中级人民法院院长、市人民检察院检察长的辞职。上述人员的辞职，应报市人民代表大会备案。市人民检察院检察长的辞职，须报经省人民检察院检察长提请省人大常委会批准。

第四条　市人大常委会行使人事任免权的程序：提请人事任免案、主任会议讨论、常委会会议审议、表决通过、公布并颁发任命书。



第二章　提请人事任免案

第五条　提请市人大常委会的人事任免案，应当由提请机关正职领导人员签署，一般应在市人大常委会举行会议的7日前提请，市人大常委会任前公示的拟任人员，一般应在市人大常委会举行会议的15日前提请，市人大常委会有关委室及时通报市人大常委会组成人员。

第六条　人事任免案依法按如下分类提请：

（一）市人大常委会主任、市人民政府市长、市中级人民法院院长、市人民检察院检察长的推选和决定代理人选案，由市人大常委会主任会议提请。

（二）市人大常委会副秘书长、办公室主任、副主任、研究室主任、副主任、工作委员会主任、副主任、委员的任免案，市人民代表大会专门委员会个别副主任委员和部分委员的任免案，由市人大常委会主任会议提请。

（三）市人民政府副市长、秘书长、局长、委员会主任的任免或撤职案，由市人民政府市长提请。

（四）市中级人民法院副院长、审判委员会委员、庭长、副庭长、审判员的任免或撤职案，由市中级人民法院院长提请。

（五）市人民检察院副检察长、检察委员会委员、检察员的任免或撤职案，县（市、区）人民检察院检察长的批准任免案和批准辞职案，由市人民检察院检察长提请。

第七条　提请人事任免案的，须提供拟任免人员的基本情况、主要简历、考察材料及其他应说明的材料。

提请机关提供的有关材料应当反映拟任命人员的思想政治素质、业务能力、法律知识和法制观念等情况。

市人大常委会组织对拟任人员进行任前法律知识考试。考试成绩向市人大常委会主任会议报告，并通报提请任命的机关。对未经市人大常委会批准，无故不参加考试或考试成绩不及格的，不提请当次会议任命。

第八条　市人大常委会组成人员、市人民代表大会专门委员会组成人员、市人民政府市长、副市长、市中级人民法院院长、市人民检察院检察长的辞职，由本人向市人大常委会呈送辞职报告。

第九条 市人大常委会主任会议，可以向市人大常委会提出本办法第三条第五项所列国家机关工作人员的撤职案。

市人大常委会五分之一以上的组成人员书面联名，可以向市人大常委会提出对本办法第三条第五项所列国家机关工作人员的撤职案，由主任会议决定是否提请市人大常委会会议审议；或者由主任会议提议，经全体会议决定，组织调查委员会，由以后的市人大常委会会议根据调查委员会的报告审议决定。
　　撤职案应当写明撤职的对象和理由，并提供有关的材料。

撤职案在提请表决前，被提出撤销职务的人员有权在市人大常委会会议上提出申辩意见，或者书面提出申辩意见，由主任会议决定印发市人大常委会会议。



第三章　讨论和审议

第十条　提请市人大常委会审议的人事任免案，应先由主任会议听取有关部门对拟任免或撤职人员的情况介绍。如情况不明、材料不齐，由提请机关负责查清情况，补充或重新报送材料。

第十一条　市人大常委会主任会议通过讨论，决定是否将人事任免案提交市人大常委会会议审议。

第十二条　人事任免案须由提请机关负责人宣读，并作说明。在市人大常委会会议审议时，提请机关应派员到会回答询问，说明情况。必要时，拟任人员应当到会与市人大常委会组成人员见面。

第十三条　人事任免案提出后至市人大常委会会议前，有反映拟任免人员重大问题的，提请机关应当向主任会议或市人大常委会提出调查核实情况报告。

市人大常委会在审议人事任免案过程中，发现拟任免人员有足以影响其任免的重要问题，提请机关应当尽快调查核实，提出书面报告。会议期间难以查清的，经主任会议提出，市人大常委会会议同意，可以暂不交付表决。问题查清后，提请机关应当提出书面报告，再由主任会议决定是否提交市人大常委会下次会议审议。

列入市人大常委会会议议程的人事任免案，在交付表决前，提请机关书面要求撤回的，对该任免案的审议即行终止。



第四章　表决通过

第十四条　经过审议的人事任免案，提交市人大常委会全体会议表决。

第十五条　市人大常委会会议表决人事任免案，采用无记名投票的方式。

人事任免案应当逐人表决，根据情况也可以合并表决。

第十六条　市人大常委会会议表决的人事任免案，以市人大常委会全体组成人员的过半数通过。

表决结果由会议主持人当场宣布。

第十七条　对提请市人大常委会任命而未获得通过的人选，可以再次提请任命，但不得在当次常委会会议重复提请。经两次表决未获得通过的人选，在本届人大常委会任期内，不得再提请任命同一职务。



第五章　公布和监督

第十八条　市人大常委会通过的人事任免案，由市人大常委会发文，并在《温州市人民代表大会常务委员会公报》、温州人大门户网站和《温州日报》上刊登。

第十九条　市人大常委会任命的国家机关工作人员，由市人大常委会颁发任命书，也可以委托提请机关代发任命书。

任命书由市人大常委会主任签署。

第二十条　由市人大常委会任命的国家机关工作人员，在市人大常委会会议审议通过之前，不得先行到职，不得对外公布。

第二十一条　市人民代表大会换届后，市人民政府市长应当在两个月内提请市人大常委会任命新一届市人民政府组成人员。

市人大常委会应当重新任命其副秘书长、办公室主任、副主任、研究室主任、副主任、各工作委员会的组成人员。上述人员如未被重新任命的，其原任职务自然免除，不再办理法律免职手续。

市人大常委会任命的市中级人民法院和市人民检察院的人员，职务没有变动的，不再重新任命。

市人大常委会任命的国家机关工作人员，因工作机构名称改变的，应当重新任命；因工作机构撤销的，应当办理免职手续。

市人大常委会任命的国家机关工作人员离职或退休的，应当提请免除其职务。

第二十二条　市人大常委会可以通过听取和审议专项工作报告、执法检查、提出询问和质询案、组织特定问题调查、审议和决定撤职案等方式，对被任命国家机关工作人员的工作情况，进行法律监督和工作监督。

第二十三条　市人大常委会受理公民和单位对被任命的国家机关工作人员的检举、揭发和控告，并依照法律处理。

第二十四条　市人大常委会任命的国家机关工作人员受刑事追究或行政处分的，处理机关应当及时报市人大常委会。



第六章　附　　则

第二十五条　本市出席省人民代表大会的代表的补选、辞职、罢免，按照代表法、选举法有关规定执行。

第二十六条　市人大常委会代表工作委员会负责办理有关人事任免案的具体事务。

第二十七条　本办法经市人大常委会会议通过后施行。